Satoshi Nakamoto, the reclusive billionaire behind Bitcoin: ‘The best outcome is that no one ever finds out’

In late October 2008, a nine‑page document titled Bitcoin: A Peer‑to‑Peer Electronic Cash System began circulating online. As the world was collapsing under the weight of a historic financial crisis, the paper proposed something radically different: a system without banks or intermediaries and a decentralized digital currency — Bitcoin. The idea drew on the ethos of the 1990s cypherpunk movement, activists who saw cryptography as a way to protect privacy from governments and corporations.

Nearly two decades later, Bitcoin has morphed into a global financial asset embraced by the very banks it sought to bypass, yet its creator remains in the shadows. The name “Satoshi Nakamoto” signed that foundational document, but the real identity behind the pseudonym has never been revealed, becoming one of finance’s greatest mysteries.

Nakamoto mined the first bitcoin on January 3, 2009, and then vanished two years later. Since then, uncovering who they might be has become an obsession for some. Over the years, multiple media outlets have tried and failed to unmask the person behind the pseudonym. The latest attempt came last week, when The New York Times pointed to British cryptographer Adam Back as the likely creator. If Nakamoto were a single individual, he would be among the richest people in the world: he controls roughly 5% of all existing bitcoins — about 1.1 million coins, valued at more than $81 billion.

Journalists have been the most persistent in the search. The New Yorker tried in 2011, first suggesting Michael Clear, a cryptography student in Dublin who quickly denied it, then Finnish researcher and former video‑game programmer Vili Lehdonvirta, who also rejected the claim. In 2014, Newsweek identified a Japanese‑American man named Dorian Nakamoto — whose legal name is, in fact, Satoshi Nakamoto — as the creator.

A year later, attention shifted to Craig Wright. In 2015, Wired and Gizmodo reported that the Australian computer scientist might be the real Satoshi. Wright had worked in several tech firms and founded a company that aimed to launch the first bitcoin‑based bank, a project that soon collapsed. But within days, Wired acknowledged inconsistencies in the evidence. Wright publicly claimed to be Nakamoto, but the story unraveled in court: in 2024, a U.K. judge ruled definitively that Wright was not the creator of Bitcoin, contradicting the only person who had ever declared himself Satoshi.

Two years ago, HBO released the documentary Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery, which floated yet another name: Canadian software developer Peter Todd. “I’m not Satoshi,” he wrote on X after the premiere. And last week, The New York Times revived the theory that Adam Back is the real Nakamoto. Back, a historic figure in the cypherpunk movement and now CEO of Blockstream, developed in the 1990s a proof‑of‑work system cited in bitcoin’s original design.

The investigation examined thousands of emails, forum posts, and linguistic similarities between Back’s writings and texts attributed to Nakamoto. It also pointed to his technical background as circumstantial evidence. But this attempt joins the long list of failures: Back has also denied being Satoshi. Alongside these journalistic efforts, conspiracy theories have proliferated, naming figures such as crypto pioneer Nick Szabo, Japanese mathematician Shinichi Mochizuki, and even government agencies.

Eighteen years after bitcoin’s creation, there are more questions than answers. No conclusive evidence has ever surfaced, the only self‑proclaimed Nakamoto was proven false, and no investigation has been independently verified. Within the crypto community, the prevailing belief is that Bitcoin was not the work of a single person but of a collective.

“It’s a puzzle with many contributors,” says Javier Pastor, head of training at Bit2Me. For him, a strong defender of Bitcoin, the absence of a central authority is precisely what protects the ecosystem. “If the creator were known, they could become a target for governments or corporations. The cypherpunks built a protective layer around the idea of decentralization, and the community will defend that narrative,” he says. “For those of us who believe in bitcoin, the best outcome is that no one ever finds out.”

The mystery surrounding his identity fits neatly with crypto’s philosophy: the ideal of privacy, the almost mystical aura around bitcoin, its independence from any form of control. The absence of an identifiable founder reinforces the system’s decentralized nature, says Román González, a product specialist at A&G. And that is precisely what sets it apart from the traditional financial system, where there is always a central anchor.

“Central banks like the Federal Reserve or the ECB, institutions like the IMF… Bitcoin breaks with that model: its issuance policy doesn’t depend on people or institutions,” he notes.

Yet that romantic idea has partly faded. Even without a central authority controlling or issuing it, bitcoin has become increasingly tied to mainstream finance, often responding to the same market logic, and its transactions are largely routed through centralized, publicly traded platforms.

“‘We are all bitcoin’ is a phrase often heard in the community — a manifesto reinforcing the idea of freedom from outside pressure. “We tend to crave a face, a biography, a human narrative to cling to, even when dealing with a system designed precisely not to depend on any of that,” González says. “Continuing to search for its creator is almost like trying to identify the inventor of the number zero: an interesting intellectual exercise, but completely irrelevant to its usefulness.”

For the crypto world, uncovering the name and surname of Bitcoin’s creator could pose an existential risk to the market itself. If the person behind the pseudonym were to reappear and move the holdings that have remained untouched for years, the price impact could be catastrophic, since bitcoin’s value partly rests on the idea that only a limited number of coins will ever exist. Many investment strategies assume that Satoshi’s stash will remain frozen, Nic Carter, founding partner of Castle Island Ventures, told Bloomberg.

That long‑standing inactivity embodies another core principle of crypto culture: the idea that investors should hold for the long term and not sell regardless of market swings — mirroring Nakamoto, the world’s largest bitcoin holder after Binance and Coinbase. In this way, the sector that has upended traditional finance and become fully integrated into it lives with several paradoxes at once. It wants to be free of all constraints, yet increasingly depends on a narrative that requires keeping its founding figure in the shadows — a living reminder of the ideology that shaped bitcoin’s origins.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition