Change jobs, leave your partner: why can’t some people stop giving advice?

You have to do this. Listen to me. Send that résumé. That person isn’t right for you. Move somewhere else. Quit that job... Phrases like these are heard often in conversations among friends, family or co-workers. It happens often in settings where the line between care, empathy and control is blurred. Some people feel a constant need to give advice, even when it hasn’t been asked for. They believe they’re doing something good, but often end up intruding in other people’s lives and sometimes damaging relationships. Those on the receiving end don’t always know how to stop the intrusion without seeming rude. Unsolicited advice can come across as invalidation or carry an implicit message: “You don’t know how to manage your own life; let me explain how to do it better.” That feeling can trigger guilt, resistance and even distance, especially when the advice comes from someone close.

The phenomenon of people who can’t help but advise others is linked to a need for control, a desire to feel useful, or to obtain emotional validation, as well as cultural codes that justify intrusion under the narrative of “I’m doing this for your own good.” For these people, giving advice is a form of care. But it can also be a way to reduce their own distress. From the perspective of attachment psychology, this impulse can be read as an attempt to lessen one’s own anxiety in the face of another’s suffering. In many cases, it’s a well-intentioned but misdirected prosocial motivation. The intention is to help, but the other person’s space and boundaries aren’t respected. The harmful element isn’t the advice itself but the message it sends when it hasn’t been requested: “I don’t trust your ability to decide.” Often, these recommendations also stem from the adviser’s own personal wounds or fears. For example, “don’t leave that job” may hide a personal insecurity; or “don’t call them” may come from their own past romantic failures. Advice thus becomes an emotional projection, biased by individual experience. And, as is obvious, what works for one person may not work for another.

Neuroscience also reminds us that the brain struggles with uncertainty. When the amygdala detects a lack of clarity or an emotional threat, it triggers a need to “do something.” That is why when someone shares a problem, the automatic reaction is often to offer quick solutions rather than to listen. Solving feels more comfortable than accompanying. But accompanying requires a nearly forgotten skill in today’s society: tolerating another person’s suffering. That is a difficult skill in a culture that rewards productivity and immediate effectiveness. We live in an era of constant advice: tutorials, wellness influencers, self-help books… Everyone seems to have something to teach: where to eat, how to sleep, what to do about work, how to get over a breakup. This increases the sense that we should always be feeling better than we are and shrinks the legitimate space to simply be unwell without having to “fix it.” In a conversation among friends, the slightest difficulty can prompt “see a therapist”; after a breakup, “have a few drinks” or “there are plenty of fish in the sea”; faced with a serious diagnosis, “everything will be fine, you’ll see.” Yet often the appropriate response would be something as basic as “How are you?” or “Thanks for telling me.”

Psychology distinguishes between instrumental support, which offers practical solutions, and emotional support, which involves being present, listening and validating what the other person feels. When there is emotional distress, the second type of support almost always helps more. Advice works well when the recipient asks for it, when it can prevent real harm, or when we speak from experience—such as when someone asks, “How do I prepare for an interview?” or “How do I fix this computer?” In those cases, practical advice makes sense. But in many other situations, how we say something matters as much as the content. The same recommendation can sound like care or like an imposition depending on tone and timing. That is why it can be more respectful to turn “do this” into questions such as: “Do you want my opinion or would you prefer I just listen?”; “What do you think you might need right now?”; “If it helps, I can tell you something that worked for me.” These questions give back confidence and space to the person speaking instead of replacing them.

Giving advice can make the giver feel powerful, useful and even generous. But unsolicited advice is often counterproductive—perhaps also because we find it hard to face another person’s suffering without wanting to “fix” it. There are not enough spaces where it’s legitimate to feel bad and where someone who is suffering won’t end up isolated. What heals most, ultimately, is not always the solution. Presence is often the most restorative thing.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition