Against the essence of the United States
The US Supreme Court’s decision allowing the application of the toughest aspects of Trump’s travel ban is bad news
The US Supreme Court’s decision allowing, albeit provisionally, the application of the toughest aspects of Donald Trump’s controversial travel ban is bad news that threatens to restrict his country’s acceptance of foreigners. Furthermore, it provides support to similar or more radical initiatives underway in other countries.

The president has trumpeted this temporary ruling in his favor as a victory for US security, given that the court has accepted that the national interest has priority over any possible damage the ban might cause immigrants and refugees. But it isn’t the same: the president’s rhetoric includes a xenophobic component that is very dangerous for a democracy. The discriminatory bias, particularly against Muslims, of the occupant of the White House since his first day in office in restricting access to the country goes against the very essence of the founding of the United States: an idea applied over the centuries that the country is a land where people from all over the world can find freedom, political and religious, as well as prosperity. The warning issued by courts in different states that Trump’s plans are based on “intolerance, animosity, and discrimination” should not go unheeded.
Fom now on, the door will be closed to refugees and citizens of many countries who pose no threat to anybody
And although the ruling is by no means definitive and will be revised by the Supreme Court in October, it means that from now on, the door will be closed to refugees and citizens of many countries who pose no threat to anybody. What’s more, history shows beyond all debate that the United States attained its status as a global democratic superpower thanks to people arriving there from all over the world, among them members of Trump’s own family.
English version by Nick Lyne.
Tu suscripción se está usando en otro dispositivo
¿Quieres añadir otro usuario a tu suscripción?
Si continúas leyendo en este dispositivo, no se podrá leer en el otro.
FlechaTu suscripción se está usando en otro dispositivo y solo puedes acceder a EL PAÍS desde un dispositivo a la vez.
Si quieres compartir tu cuenta, cambia tu suscripción a la modalidad Premium, así podrás añadir otro usuario. Cada uno accederá con su propia cuenta de email, lo que os permitirá personalizar vuestra experiencia en EL PAÍS.
¿Tienes una suscripción de empresa? Accede aquí para contratar más cuentas.
En el caso de no saber quién está usando tu cuenta, te recomendamos cambiar tu contraseña aquí.
Si decides continuar compartiendo tu cuenta, este mensaje se mostrará en tu dispositivo y en el de la otra persona que está usando tu cuenta de forma indefinida, afectando a tu experiencia de lectura. Puedes consultar aquí los términos y condiciones de la suscripción digital.
More information
Archived In
Últimas noticias
Maduro pleads not guilty before the federal court in New York: ‘I am still the president of Venezuela’
A new test can detect Alzheimer’s from a finger prick
UN team enters Sudanese city of El Fasher after paramilitary massacre: ‘It’s like a ghost town’
A recipe for resistance: Indigenous peoples politicize their struggles from the kitchen
Most viewed
- Gilles Lipovetsky: ‘If you want to live better and fall in love, take Prozac, don’t look to philosophy’
- Alain Aspect, Nobel laureate in physics: ‘Einstein was so smart that he would have had to recognize quantum entanglement’
- Maduro’s downfall puts China’s relationship with Venezuela to the test
- Why oil has been at the center of Venezuela-US conflicts for decades
- Alvin Hellerstein, a 92-year-old judge appointed by Bill Clinton, to preside over Maduro’s trial in New York










































